Introduction

Atelier is an agentic classification workbench for Cloudera AI. It classifies column metadata using six independent evidence sources fused via Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST), producing belief intervals instead of point estimates. An LLM-in-the-loop convergence agent identifies disagreements between sources and orchestrates targeted reclassification until the corpus stabilizes.

Why Belief Intervals?

Traditional classifiers output a single probability \( P(A) = 0.85 \) — “85% email address.” This conflates two fundamentally different situations: high confidence with abundant evidence vs. moderate confidence with sparse evidence. A Bayesian posterior and a coin flip can both yield 0.5, but they represent very different epistemic states.

Dempster-Shafer theory separates these via the belief function \( \text{Bel}(A) \) and plausibility function \( \text{Pl}(A) \), where:

$$ \text{Bel}(A) = \sum_{B \subseteq A} m(B), \qquad \text{Pl}(A) = 1 - \text{Bel}(\bar{A}) $$

The interval \( [\text{Bel}(A),; \text{Pl}(A)] \) bounds the true probability. Its width \( \text{Pl}(A) - \text{Bel}(A) \) quantifies epistemic uncertainty — how much we don’t know:

This distinction drives the entire pipeline: columns with wide belief gaps (where \( \text{Pl}(A) - \text{Bel}(A) \) is large) are automatically escalated for LLM re-examination with enriched context. Conflict \( K \) is tracked as a diagnostic but the gap width determines which columns need attention.

Architecture

Six Evidence Sources

Each source independently produces a mass function \( m_i : 2^\Theta \to [0, 1] \) over the frame of discernment \( \Theta \) (the set of all category codes). Sources are grouped by computational cost:

The SVM and CatBoost classifiers occupy deliberately orthogonal feature spaces: the SVM operates on sparse lexical features (TF-IDF) while CatBoost uses dense semantic embeddings. This architectural separation ensures genuine evidence independence for Dempster’s rule.

Fusion

Sources are combined via the conjunctive rule of combination:

$$ m_{1 \oplus 2}(C) = \frac{1}{1-K} \sum_{\substack{A \cap B = C \ A,B \subseteq \Theta}} m_1(A) \cdot m_2(B) $$

where the conflict \( K = \sum_{A \cap B = \varnothing} m_1(A) \cdot m_2(B) \) measures the degree to which sources contradict each other. High \( K \) is the diagnostic signal that drives the convergence loop: columns where independent evidence sources disagree are escalated for targeted LLM revisit with enriched context (ML prediction, belief interval, source disagreement).

Hierarchical Classification

The vocabulary forms a rooted code tree (e.g., ICE.SENSITIVE.PID.CONTACT.EMAIL). Belief and plausibility are queryable at any depth — \( \text{Bel}(\texttt{ICE.SENSITIVE}) \) aggregates all descendants. The cautious_code(τ) operator returns the deepest code where \( \text{Bel} > \tau \), enabling principled depth-accuracy tradeoffs: high \( \tau \) yields coarse but reliable labels; low \( \tau \) yields specific but less certain ones.

Convergence

The bootstrap pipeline iterates three phases until the belief gap (\( \text{Pl}(A) - \text{Bel}(A) \)) stabilizes:

1. LLM sweep — classify each directly-targeted column via batch LLM calls
2. ML validation — run the full 6-source DST pipeline; compute per-column belief, plausibility, and gap
3. Targeted revisit — re-classify only uncertain columns (high gap or low belief) with enriched context (ML prediction + belief interval + detected patterns + disagreement summary)

The primary convergence measure is mean belief gap — the average width of the \( [\text{Bel}, \text{Pl}] \) interval across all columns. A narrow gap means the evidence sources agree on a confident prediction. Conflict \( K \) is tracked as a diagnostic signal (it indicates source disagreement) but does not gate convergence — a column can have \( K = 0.9 \) but \( \text{Bel} = 0.95 \): the sources fought, but the winner is clear.

An agent-driven variant (via Claude Agent SDK) delegates the revisit strategy to an LLM that reasons about uncertainty patterns and declares convergence when diminishing returns are reached. (Earlier revisions exposed a retrain_svm tool that progressively improved the SVM on accumulated LLM labels — excised on 2026-05-04 for source-independence reasons; see DST Evidence Independence.) The programmatic variant uses gap + coverage thresholds for environments where tool-use isn’t available.

SVM with Vocabulary Alignment

The SVM is trained once on the synthetic corpus with TF-IDF features and labels keyed on the bundled-ontology ICE.* leaves. At runtime, predictions are translated into the user’s taxonomy via a cached LLM-mediated alignment (atelier.classify.ontology_alignment) so the SVM contributes user-taxonomy evidence even when the operator’s vocabulary is completely disjoint from ICE.*. The alignment is weakly non-distinct evidence under Denoeux 2008 — vocabulary-level shared error with the runtime LLM rather than per-column shared labels — and the discount calibration carries the residual. See DST Evidence Independence for the full design rationale and the BM25-reranker future-work plan.

Scale

The pipeline handles corpora from 50 columns (OOTB sample) to 120M+ columns (full GitTables at 10M+ tables). Monte Carlo stratified sampling selects a representative subset for direct LLM classification and propagates labels to the remaining corpus via embedding similarity.

With max_sampled_columns = 500, classifying a 120M-column corpus requires LLM inference on only 0.0004% of columns — a >99.99% cost reduction while preserving classification quality through DST conflict-driven escalation of uncertain propagations.

Out-of-the-Box Experience

A fresh deployment auto-seeds on first boot:

1. 316-leaf BFO-grounded vocabulary (351 categories total) covering the CCO Information Content Entity trichotomy: Designative (names, IDs, codes), Descriptive (measurements, dates, amounts), Prescriptive (software, specs)
2. 25 sample tables with 316 columns and a committed curated reference
3. One-click classification via the Status page
4. Interactive Embeddings visualization (UMAP/t-SNE via embedding-atlas)

Quick Start

Local development (devenv):

devenv shell          # Enter dev environment
just install          # Install Python + Node dependencies
just up               # Start gRPC + gateway + Vite dev server

CAI deployment: Deploy as an AMP from https://github.com/zndx/atelier.

Documentation Map

• System Overview — Component diagram
• Deployment — CAI AMP and local dev setup
• gRPC & Gateway — Proto contract, REST endpoints, config lifecycle
• Keystone Agents — Agent convergence loop with 6 tools
• Classification Pipeline — DST methodology, evidence sources, bootstrap convergence
• Monte Carlo Sampling — Stratified sampling for scale
• GPU Acceleration — CUDA detection and batch encoding
• Synthetic Data & Training — 316+ generators, ontology-aligned SVM, CatBoost fit-to-LLM
• Embeddings — Interactive parquet visualization
• Data Sources — Source-aware versioning, OOTB sample, Hive auto-discovery
• BDD Scenarios — 141 scenarios across 4 domains